Prediction of Danie Visser vs David Pate Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Visser vs D. Pate

Danie Visser

RSA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

David Pate

USA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Visser 2 - 1 Pate

They have played 7 sets in total, with Danie Visser winning 4 and David Pate winning 3. The last match between Danie Visser and David Pate was at the Stratton Mountain, 03-08-1987, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Danie Visser getting the victory 7-6 3-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Visser	2
Pate	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) Stratton Mountain(08-03-87)

Stats

Danie Visser

David Pate

(R3) Honolulu(09-24-84)

Stats

David Pate

Danie Visser

(QF) Vienna CH(03-05-84)

Stats

Danie Visser

David Pate

D. Visser vs D. Pate H2H Profile

D. Visser	Stats	D. Pate
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.05% (111-141)	Career Total W/L	52.85% (195-174)
1	Hard	1
1	Indoor	0
1	Titles	2
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Visser vs D. Pate Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Danie Visser has won 0% of points on their second serve, while David Pate has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Danie Visser, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while David Pate has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Danie Visser has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas David Pate has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Danie Visser has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with David Pate winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/17). David Pate has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 123/99), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 5/14).
Player level: In the last year, Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as David Pate has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Danie Visser winning 2 times and David Pate being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Danie Visser winning 4 and David Pate winning 3.
The last match between Danie Visser and David Pate was at the Stratton Mountain, 03-08-1987, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Danie Visser getting the victory 7-6 3-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Danie Visser has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while David Pate has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Danie Visser has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while David Pate has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Danie Visser has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and David Pate has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Danie Visser vs David Pate Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Visser vs D. Pate H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Visser	Stats	D. Pate
2	H2H Matches Won	1
4	Sets Won	3
38	Games Won	34
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
67% (2/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	33% (1/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski	L	7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 05-08-1991
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
R1 Ronald AgenorR. Agenor	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(2)	Stats
Berlin - 08-10-1990
R2 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Franco DavinF. Davin	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Pate Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tokyo - 10-04-1995
R1 Kotaro MiyachiK. Miyachi	L	6-2 2-6 6-3	Stats
Tokyo - 04-04-1994
R1 Shuzo MatsuokaS. Matsuoka	W	6-4 1-6 6-3	Stats
R2 Jonathan StarkJ. Stark	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Queen's Club - 07-06-1993
R1 Jamie MorganJ. Morgan	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Scottsdale - 22-02-1993
R1 Andrei ChesnokovA. Chesnokov	L	6-3 3-6 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Visser vs D. Pate Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Visser	Stats	D. Pate
44.05% (111/141)	YTD Win/Loss	52.85% (195/174)
46.67% (315/360)	Sets Win/Loss	51.39% (480/454)
49.16% (3314/3427)	Games Win/Loss	50.49% (4648/4558)
45.19% (61/74)	Hard Win/Loss	55.41% (123/99)
26.09% (6/17)	Clay Win/Loss	26.32% (5/14)
48.00% (12/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.70% (36/35)
46.38% (32/37)	Grass Win/Loss	54.39% (31/26)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
379.74	Average Opponent Rank	0.35
48.94% (23/24)	Slam W/L	38.10% (16/26)
41.38% (12/17)	Masters W/L	40.63% (13/19)
39.31% (57/88)	Main Tour W/L	55.27% (152/123)
61.29% (19/12)	Challenger W/L	70.00% (14/6)
43% (85/199)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (178/322)
48% (25/52)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	36% (17/47)
67% (2/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	36% (5/14)
42% (37/89)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (67/125)
72% (121/87)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (197/163)
28% (121/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (197/34)
18% (130/23)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (172/32)